Media

'Eat Popcorn, Drink Coke': The Subliminal Advertising Hoax

In 1957, market researcher James Vicary claimed that flashing 'Eat Popcorn' and 'Drink Coke' on a movie screen had increased snack sales. The claim set off a national panic about subliminal mind control. Vicary later admitted the study was a fabrication, according to psychologist Anthony Pratkanis.

Illustration of a bucket of popcorn in front of a blank cinema screen.
Illustration of a bucket of popcorn in front of a blank cinema screen. Illustration: The Tinfoil Tribune

Verdict: Debunked. The weight of the evidence cited below contradicts this claim. How we rate stories

The Story

In 1957, an American market researcher named James Vicary made a startling announcement. According to reports at the time, as recounted by psychologist Anthony Pratkanis in the Skeptical Inquirer, Vicary had flashed the words 'Eat Popcorn' and 'Drink Coke' onto a movie screen in Fort Lee, New Jersey, for a third of a millisecond. He claimed that over six weeks, Coke sales rose 18 percent and popcorn sales almost 58 percent.

The public was alarmed. The editor Norman Cousins asked, 'If the device is successful for putting over popcorn, why not politicians or anything else?' The Federal Communications Commission ruled that using subliminal messages could result in the loss of a broadcast license, and the National Association of Broadcasters banned them. Australia and Britain banned subliminal advertising, according to Pratkanis. The idea that hidden messages could control behavior became a lasting fear.

Vicary later called his own famous study a fabrication.

The experiment, however, was never verified. Pratkanis wrote that Henry Link, president of the Psychological Corporation, challenged Vicary to a controlled test supervised by an independent firm, and sales of Coke and popcorn did not change. According to Pratkanis, Vicary said in a 1962 interview that the study had been a fabrication intended to increase customers for his business. Pratkanis wrote that the interview was with Advertising Age.

Pratkanis concluded that more than a century of research had failed to show that subliminal commands influence behavior. The 'Eat Popcorn' story still circulates as if it were proven.

■

Origins

Writing in the Skeptical Inquirer in 1992, Pratkanis described how, according to reports at the time, Vicary flashed the messages for a third of a millisecond during films at a theater in Fort Lee, New Jersey. Vicary claimed sales of Coke rose 18 percent and popcorn almost 58 percent.

The Claims

Key Evidence

Fact Check Debunked

The Evidence Against

  • Pratkanis wrote that in a 1962 interview, Vicary announced the 'Eat Popcorn/Drink Coke' study was a fabrication intended to increase customers for his business.
  • When Henry Link of the Psychological Corporation challenged Vicary to a controlled, independent test, Pratkanis wrote, there was no change in Coke or popcorn purchases.
  • Pratkanis concluded that more than a century of research had failed to find evidence that subliminal commands influence behavior.

Documents & Sources

Each link was checked for availability on Oct. 27, 2026. Links open in a new tab.